Inter-Recial Prejudice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Inter-Recial Prejudice - Essay ExampleImportant aspects of this translation are the words damage/ wounding, judgment/ action and disregard. Both damage and disregard may be considered as a result of the judgment passed by the person practicing impairment upon the person who is at the receiving end. Research in prejudice (Baron and Bryne, 208-209) shows that such judgments are passed on the basis of stereotypes held and on the basis of the discrimination resulting from the stereotypes. Stereotypes are cognitive shortcuts that slew use in order to categorize individuals on the basis of a few characteristics without paying attention to any new(prenominal) characteristics that may distinguish the finicky individual from the group. The stereotypes in themselves are not negative but may be associated with other negative thoughts nigh the categories, which are then applied to the situation individual without purge ascertaining if the individual deserves to be categorized in this ma nner. Moghaddam (in Schneider, Gruman and Coutts, 345) defines prejudice as an attitude based solely on group rank and file. This definition underlines the fact that an individuals membership to a bug outicular group is an important aspect of the way flock view them and could bias the attitudes of others if they hold stereotypes about the said group. Most types of group memberships are invisible to the outsider for example, training, education, occupation, and religion. Unless the individual divulges these facts, others are unable to illuminate him / her on the basis of these affiliations that the individual has. But membership to groups like gender and race are not invisible and come across as part of the individuals physical characteristics. Thus, it becomes easy for others to classify an individual on the basis of these factors. When people from different racial background interact, often the first information they share with each other before they even initiate contact is t he information supplied by their physical appearance. If an individual holds a negative stereotype against a particular race he / she is likely to obtain prejudiced against individuals from that racial background. This prejudice would be experienced even before there is any communication and it is likely that due to the pre-existing prejudice, this individual short-changes the other simply due to their racial background (Sears, Peplau, Freedman and Taylor, 417). Baron and Bryne (207) describe another important aspect of why people experience prejudice amicable categorization. They describe how people tend to categorize others on the basis of the extent to which they obtain similar to those individuals. Persons who are perceived as similar become part of the in-group, and those who seem different become part of the out group. People also typically feel more favorable towards members of an in-group then towards members of an out-group. This is because people like to feel good abou t themselves and their group memberships and thus tend to highlight not just the positive aspects of their individual selves, but those of others they feel similar to. For the same reason, they hearten down the negative aspects of their own and similar others behaviors. On the other hand, people tend to exaggerate the weaknesses of heterogeneous others, and play down the positive aspects of their behavior. This leads to the Fundamental ascription error a fallacy where people attribute positive causes to personal behavior (and as a consequence the behavior of similar others) and negative causes to behaviors of dissimilar others. Although the reason why humans prefer to categorize people into in-groups and out-groups is not properly understood it is a tendency that is found in all people